![]() ![]() It's not free, but it's a significant savings in terms of the production budget." But if I can figure out a way to justify the use of the shuttle, it's going to help me a lot. Suddenly I won't have as much money for a lot of other things. Suddenly I won't have as much money to build a moon base. "So, in just a dollars and cents, producer part of me, it was like, if I give that up, I'm going to have to cut back on a lot of other things. ![]() There is an existing set that replicates the interior cockpit of the space shuttle. "There would be no clips that I could use. "If we didn't use the shuttle and we had to create a whole new vehicle for travel, it was going to cost me a lot more," said Moore. "It would have felt odd to me, as a viewer, if there was no space shuttle because it was the forefront of the American space program for quite a while."īut there was also a practical reason to use the space shuttle. "It's a touchstone for the audience in terms of the space program itself, especially in the 1980s," Moore told collectSPACE. Moore could have avoided the whole question by not using the shuttle, or altering its design (as ultimately is done with the introduction of the second-generation Pathfinder orbiter), but he felt it was important to have the iconic vehicle included in the show's version of space exploration history. ![]() "When the story had to trump the physics, they always gave me the chance to at least put in a little 'fig leaf,' and if you listen really carefully, there's one line of dialogue in episode nine of season two where we do explain how the shuttle might have been able to get to the moon," Reisman said. But if there is something that feels really important to the story, the story is going to win," he said. "The great thing about 'For All Mankind' is that they do try to get as much of the technical stuff as accurate as they can. "We even did calculations that showed if you filled up the payload bay with hydrazine and fed it to the OMS engines, you still couldn't get to the moon and back without exceeding the payload mass of the orbiter."īut Reisman also knew that if they were going to overlook that, they had a good reason. It had nowhere near enough delta-v," he said, referring to a change in velocity. "We all pointed out that the shuttle could never actually get to the moon. #Nasa space shuttle in space seriesReisman, who made a cameo appearance as the commander of the space shuttle Columbia on its way back from the moon, has served as a technical advisor for the series from its start. ![]() "Okay, so we know it can't," Garrett Reisman, a former NASA astronaut who flew on the space shuttle, admitted in an interview with collectSPACE. As a result, fans of "For All Mankind" took to Reddit and Facebook, to a wiki created specifically for the show and to YouTube to offer up their own explanations - some rather detailed, diving into the orbital mechanics of the problem. Moore and his fellow producers and writers have paid to the actual history and to justifying the changes they have made. It does not carry enough propellant to leave Earth's orbit and travel to the moon," the space agency stated.Īnd yet, multiple times in "For All Mankind," the series showed the shuttles flying to the moon.Īs the series is set in a different timeline, one could write it off to being science fiction, were it not for the attention to detail that show creator Ronald D. "The space shuttle is designed to travel in low-Earth orbit (within a few hundred miles of the Earth's surface). In response, NASA explained why not on its website. The actual winged orbiters never flew to the moon, although the public sometimes thought that they did. "For All Mankind," which follows what might have happened if the Soviet Union beat the United States to landing the first astronaut, or rather cosmonaut, on the moon in the 1960s, jumped into the early 1980s for its second season, which as real history records is when the space shuttle-era began. How was it possible for NASA's space shuttles to fly to the moon? The 11 words offer an explanation, however brief, for a point that was debated and discussed across multiple online communities, even though it was tangential to the series' plot lines. That one line, from the penultimate episode of the now complete second season of "For All Mankind," seemed to answer one of, if not the most frequently asked questions about the Apple TV+ alternate space history series. "Our shuttles need to refuel before they burn for the moon." ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |