![]() ![]() For example, Nye exclusively met with President Obama, an experience atypical for the average advocate. As a result, scientists tend to have special access to members of Congress, agency staff, journalists, and the public at large. population are trained scientists, and even fewer are experts in climate science. The scarcity of scientists gives their work higher levels of exposure. Now we can’t take the science for granted it’s important as ever to empower scientists to broadcast their findings and the urgent need for action. During the Obama administration, climate science was taken as a given, and implementation was the focus. Combined, scientists can explain new details about climate change to encourage political change. Additionally, the nature of the scientist career, and the priority of research, entails them to continue to further understanding. The scientific method, ingrained in scientists from their earliest training, values the lack of influence from anything other than the observable. Against an administration that gained support from climate hysteria and discredited climate change altogether, it will be important to continue to push back with provable facts, instead of flourishing rhetoric. They are continuously producing information on complex concepts with objectivity. With suspicion already high, readers and listeners will need to feel they're hearing from primary sources, not secondary sources – a perspective that's always more persuasive. ![]() He could speak from the model he developed, and consequently his testimony initiated some of the first calls to action around climate change. Hansen told Congress in June 1988that “If our model is approximately correct, such may be more common in the next 10 to 15 years than they were in the period 1950 to 1980,” he is actually discussing what he is personally familiar with as a trained physicist. They don't just quote others as faithful essay writers, but they summarize work they know intimately, much of it their own. ![]() They readily speak with authority on topics in their fields. Here are 5 reasons that scientist-advocates will be among the best voices to influence policymakers in the next four years: But as Hansen, Hayhoe, and Nye effectively demonstrate, scientists have added qualities that make them opportune advocates for climate awareness. Typical advocates are ones that care about communicating a cause. There are scientist-advocate standouts, such as James Hansen, former head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, who quit his full-time science position to do more frequent and impactful climate advocacy Katherine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist who sits on the board for the Citizens Climate Lobby, a non-profit that calls for a carbon tax and scientist and television star Bill Nye who uses his media platform to criticize Trump’s pick for the head of the Environmental Protection Agency and general climate skepticism. Scientists have long been leaders in climate advocacy. The anti-science world that Donald Trump is motivating prompts the question, are scientists irrelevant for the next administration? I argue that scientists will be important as some of the most well-suited climate advocates to generate change during the Trump presidency. With such obstacles, the results of climate studies might be ignored, if climate research even gets funded at all. ![]() Accusations of climate change as a Chinese hoax, National Aeronautics and Space Association (NASA) and National Science Foundation (NSF) budget cuts, and outright climate change deniersin cabinet positions are among the changes under the upcoming Trump administration that climate scientists must overcome to do their research. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |